My machine shows the following tools: 'git mergetool -tool=' may be set to one of the following: araxis emerge vimdiff vimdiff2 vimdiff3 The following tools are valid, but not currently available: bc bc3 codecompare deltawalker diffmerge diffuse ecmerge examdiff guiffy gvimdiff gvimdiff2 gvimdiff3 kdiff3 meld opendiff p4merge smerge tkdiff tortoisemerge winmerge xxdiff Some of the tools listed above only work in a windowed environment. To see the available merge tools on your machine, run the following command: git mergetool -tool-help with Ctrl+C on Linux) and pass the tool from the beginning: git mergetool -tool=vimdiff3 You can enter one of the tools, or exit (e.g. It also asks you to choose a resolution tool. It shows you some of the available merge tools:Īs well as the conflict: Both the local and the remote versions have created the same file auto-assign.yml. github/workflows/auto-assign.yml Normal merge conflict for '.github/workflows/auto-assign.yml': : created file Hit return to start merge resolution tool (bc):
'git mergetool' will now attempt to use one of the following tools: meld opendiff kdiff3 tkdiff xxdiff tortoisemerge gvimdiff diffuse diffmerge ecmerge p4merge araxis bc codecompare smerge emerge vimdiff Merging. See 'git mergetool -tool-help' or 'git help config' for more details. If it’s your first time, git will probably show you a message like this: This message is displayed because 'merge.tool' is not configured. Go ahead and enter the following command into your command line: git mergetool Also, a file with too many conflicts is usually unreadable and very hard to deal with.
Using this method, one might mess the file up and leave some of the aforementioned lines behind. Then save the file and stage it using git: git add auto-assign.yml One could simply use any text editor to remove the three following lines: > Conflicting commitĪnd also compromise between the two versions. So, now, how to resolve it? Edit the Text In a nutshell, this part of the code shows two versions of the file on top of each other. Then she rebased her branch onto master, and this conflict happened.
The other party just added a single line of comment saying “Nothing is here yet”, and committed it, setting “Conflicting commit” as the commit message. One of them created some config and merged them into the master branch. So, this is a file that two parties edited. So, what does a conflict look like? Let’s take a look at an example: > Conflicting commit
0 kommentar(er)
